Frankenstein’s Mycoplasma
January 25, 2008 on 5:18 pm | In ethics, science |There’s incredible news this week in biotechnology. Dan Gibson, a geneticist at the J. Craig Venter Institute in Rockville, Maryland (strong deeds, gentle words!), has announced that his team of researchers have succeeded in constructing the largest man-made DNA structure—at 582,970 base pairs in length, it’s over 20 times longer than the previous record! The artificial sequence was pieced together from four smaller (but still massive!) strands of DNA by utilizing the transcription power of yeast, and is precisely modeled on the genome of a bacterium known as Mycoplasma genitalium. With characteristic optimism, they’re now confident that they will be able to produce the very first man-made organism within the year. If they do that, the goal of biofuel production from cellulosic biomass will be within arm’s reach.¹
What does this mean? Imagine the end of fossil fuels: a cessation of ecologically devastating drilling operations, deflation of the political and economic power of neoconservative oil barons, and affordable, low-emission transportation, heating, and electricity. The impact of this technology is profound, and it doesn’t stop there. By discovering the details of biochemical and metabolic pathways, we can more closely mimic their elegance and efficiency to solve problems that plague industrial civilization. Maybe we’ll engineer a primitive, self-sustaining bio-robot that feeds on CO2 and excretes O2. Perhaps we could remove mercury from our water supplies. The limitations are not known, but the possibilities are awe-inspiring.
There has been some criticism of this work, notably by the Canadian-based ETC Group, a biotechnology watchdog organization. I agree with most of ETC Group’s principles (conserving agricultural biodiversity, fighting against patents for bioengineered plants). It is therefore fair to accuse me of wanting to have it both ways on this issue. I do see both sides, and I think that governments should regulate this kind of biotechnology. I am not worried about the J. Craig Venter Institute, which has demonstrated a responsible concern with ethics in this and previous projects. Venter himself shared the human genome’s raw code with the public for free after decoding it; his business aimed to make money by selling analytical services and bioinformatics software used for studying the genome. Others, however, are not nearly as scrupulous. I can’t say I endorse a moratorium at this point, but I do think that the USDA and Centers for Disease Control should be closely monitoring this type of research.
Still, this is exciting. You can expect me to post more on this topic in the future.
¹ Science Volume 315, No. 5813, 9 February 2007, pp. 801-804. Challenges in Engineering Microbes for Biofuels Production, by Gregory Stephanopoulos.
8 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
This is very exciting news indeed! I think it’s interesting they chose Mycoplasma to work with. An interesting characteristic of Mycoplasma is they lack cell walls.
Comment by Pegasus — January 27, 2008 #
I did not know that! I wonder if that makes it easier somehow…
Comment by simian — January 27, 2008 #
Yeah, I wondered that too. For instance, maybe their genome has fewer base pairs since it does not have to code for the proteins to build a cell wall. When I have more time I’ll have to see if I can find some specific numbers.
Comment by Pegasus — January 28, 2008 #
It’s amazing even that an ecological niche exists for an organism without a cell wall. I just learned that Mycoplasma are immune to antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis, which may explain that. It’s amazing what an impact the invention of antiseptics, antibiotics, and vaccines have had on bacterial evolution (at least the ones that follow humans around!).
Comment by simian — January 28, 2008 #
Just had to add the “neoconservative oil barons” comment eh? Jesus…
Comment by gijoe — January 31, 2008 #
What’s your point? Are you trying to lead me to Jesus?
Comment by simian — January 31, 2008 #
gijoe has a point, the humans are assuming the adult phase in the universe. At least he didn’t call for god, we (humans) really don’t need it any more, we learned to read the ‘book of life’ and now we learned to copy write it, soon there will be new ‘romances’ to enjoy or regret.
Comment by Helder - Pt — January 31, 2008 #
I think I understood that all except for the new ‘romances.’ Are you implying we may decode love? I would point you to my first-ever entry in this blog for my view on that…
Comment by simian — January 31, 2008 #